/News

February 17, 2025

Building Resilience Against Emerging Litigation Risks in the Captive Market

Single Parent Captives (SPC), or wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries, have long been used by large corporations to manage risks and retain liability. Whether a company’s key risks are related to new building materials, environmental concerns, or other unforeseen liabilities, captives can offer them a flexible and strategic approach to risk management.  Specifically, they play a crucial role in capital optimization, ensuring that risk is managed efficiently across the entire business rather than a series of isolated transactions enabling higher-level risk transfer and optimise the total cost of risk savings.

Where captives help U.S. corporations retain lower-layer exposures for casualty, property, and other risks, they also enable higher-level risk transfer, optimizing the total cost of risk while preserving enterprise value.

As respects risks which are typically addressed with excess casualty insurance, the occurrence trigger nature of the underlying policy can create a potential longtail “stacking of limits” over time for certain mass tort events, as has been evident by environmental impairment liabilities and asbestos claims.   While many of these risks have been constrained by policy and trigger restrictions since the mid 1980’s, others remain exposed to long-term litigation cycles. Captive managers must consider these liabilities not just as an underwriting challenge but as a core capital management issue.

The recent decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ban food additive erythrosine or ‘Red Dye No. 3’ exemplifies the potential challenges of long tail corporate liabilities. This dye, which has been extensively used to add color to food and medication for decades, has now been classified as a carcinogen and banned for ingestible use.  (Manufacturers have until January 15, 2027, for food products and January 18, 2028, for drugs to reformulate their products without Red Dye No. 3.  Interestingly, the use of Red Dye No. 3 was banned in the U.S. for cosmetics and topical medications in 1990.)

This regulatory shift mirrors broader trends in mass litigation, where consumer product risks rapidly evolve into enterprise-level financial exposures.  Consumers exposed to products containing Red Dye No. 3 may soon be encouraged to join legal action through advertising and organized campaigns, similar to those seen in other large-scale litigations in the U.S., such as those which emerged during the opioid crisis. Food and drug companies could face unprotected exposures and potentially significant losses. As a result, they will likely face an increasingly complex and risky legal landscape over the next 12 to 36 months, with a potentially adverse financial aftermath.

Captives holding years of accumulated exposures from long-term occurrence-based policies may now be significantly affected. This risk presents a critical balance sheet issue, impacting renewals, investor confidence, and overall financial strategy. Rather than simply seeking risk transfer solutions, the focus should now be on capital optimization to ensure that risks are managed efficiently across the entire balance sheet.

A strategic capital management approach helps captives restructure liabilities while maintaining financial flexibility. A retrospective solution like a Loss Portfolio Transfer (“LPT”)  proactively addresses long-tail systemic exposures such as Red Dye No. 3. An LPT can help enable management to release and repurpose trapped capital, improve financial resilience, and present a stronger balance sheet to investors and stakeholders—demonstrating proactive risk control and capital management.

Emerging litigation risks like Red Dye No. 3 highlight the need for captives to rethink risk strategy. Shifting from a transactional view to a whole-account capital strategy unlocks financial resilience, operational flexibility, and sustainable growth.

Our tailored captive solutions go beyond traditional risk management, offering data-driven strategies that enhance financial efficiency. Partnering with Chief Risk Officers and Chief Financial Officers, we provide strategic insights and customized solutions that optimize capital deployment, strengthen risk control, and drive long-term success.